🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about business sector influence with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be decreased to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least half of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “extending from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator said: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.