Skip to content
Global Observer

Activist Group Asserts to Have Scraped Countless of Music Files from Spotify

An activist group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them online.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the seeming data breach could boost AI companies searching for data to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million entries of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access found a third party collected public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the breached music would probably be utilized for training AI models.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to train its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. He said it could also allow tech companies to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.

About the author

Tyler Weiss

A seasoned journalist with over 15 years of experience covering European politics and international relations, based in Berlin.

Global Observer

Type to search articles.